RV campground age restrictions are becoming a contentious issue within the RV community, as highlighted by a recent personal experience shared online. The Grateful Glamper described an instance where they were denied reservations due to the age of their RV, despite its excellent condition.
Traditionally, older RVs could bypass age restrictions by providing current photos, but this policy was not upheld in this case. The author did not initially disclose the campground’s name, but later shared it with a fellow RV owner to conduct an experiment. This owner, possessing a high-end yet older Prevost bus, was also denied reservations, underscoring the rigidity of these restrictions.
These age restrictions are perceived as exclusionary, affecting well-maintained older RVs. Many RV owners take exceptional care of their vehicles, ensuring they remain in excellent condition well beyond the typical 10 or 15-year cutoff.
This attention to maintenance often means these older models are just as luxurious and functional as newer ones. However, by imposing age limits, campgrounds overlook the quality and upkeep of these vehicles, focusing solely on their manufacture date. This practice disregards the efforts of owners who prioritize the longevity and functionality of their RVs.
Economic discrimination is another significant concern. The 10 or 15-year rule inherently favors those who can afford newer models, alienating a substantial portion of the RV community. RVing has historically been an accessible mode of travel for families across various economic backgrounds.
These age restrictions, however, turn RV resorts into enclaves for the wealthier owners, undermining the inclusive nature of the RV lifestyle. The author, who values the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of older models, views these policies as detrimental to the community’s diversity.
Furthermore, the resale value of older RVs is negatively impacted by these restrictions. Potential buyers may be deterred, knowing that their travel options could be limited by the age policies of certain campgrounds.
This reduction in resale value affects the broader market for RV sales and exchanges, pushing buyers towards newer models despite the superior craftsmanship of older vehicles. The author’s experiment with the high-end Prevost bus, which was also denied entry, highlights the arbitrary nature of these age limits.
Environmental sustainability is another critical issue. Encouraging the purchase of new RVs by enforcing age restrictions contradicts eco-friendly practices.
The production of new RVs has a significant environmental footprint, whereas maintaining and using older, well-functioning vehicles is more sustainable. The author argues that RV parks should consider the broader implications of their policies and the environmental benefits of allowing older models.
RV campground age restrictions raise several concerns, from economic discrimination to environmental impact. The experiences shared by the author illustrate the need for a more inclusive approach that values maintenance and sustainability over arbitrary age limits. These policies not only affect individual RV owners but also have broader implications for the RV community and industry.