A recent survey on proposed development at Rockport State Park shows most participants prefer the park remain largely unchanged, according to results released by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. The DNR said it plans to seek additional public input in the coming weeks.
According to an article published by The Alpena News on February 13, a draft campground design proposes 100 full-service sites, 55 rustic sites, six hike-in rustic sites, and eight rustic cabins.
Planned amenities include a Dark Sky Interpretive Area with informational displays and star charts, a trail with guiding ropes to the viewing area, telescopes overlooking Lake Huron, a boat launch, kayak launch, parking for trail users, restrooms, shower facilities, benches, picnic tables, and grills.
Fewer than 90 people submitted detailed comments on a plan to add a modern campground, while more than 1,000 completed a broader survey on park use and potential improvements.
The survey was conducted online from mid-October to late November of last year and included questions about visitors’ activities, satisfaction levels, and opinions on development plans.
A total of 1,009 people responded, 919 of whom had previously visited the park. Those who had not visited cited lack of amenities, distance from home, limited information, or plans to visit in the future.
Survey participants reported hiking, running, and dog walking as their most common activities, followed by scenic viewing, dark sky observation, fossil hunting, and fishing. Supporters of the proposed campground said it could ease access to campsites, which fill quickly at local campgrounds, and provide a boost for nearby businesses.
Respondents were asked to identify up to three elements of the draft development plan they would most like implemented. The most selected option was “nothing/leave it the way it is,” followed by trail improvements for hiking, biking, and equestrian use, and expanded water access, including a boat and kayak launch and swimming areas.
The survey also asked which elements participants would least like to see implemented. “Camping in general” was the top response, followed by “everything/leave it the way it is” and “modern camping.”
Some respondents also described the plan as “too developed in general” and expressed concern that improvements would attract too many visitors.