A proposed glamping development in Hardwick, near Abergavenny, has encountered significant opposition from members of Monmouthshire County Council’s planning committee.
The application, which includes plans for four shepherd huts and four bell tents on a field already housing alpacas at Swallow’s Nest along Parc Llettis Road, was originally recommended for approval.
However, following a committee meeting, councillors indicated that it would be recommended for refusal when it returns in August.
Concerns raised by councillors focused on potential impacts to neighbouring properties, the suitability of local infrastructure, and broader environmental considerations.
Councillor Dale Rooke, representing Chepstow for Labour, questioned the proximity of the proposed glamping tents to a nearby residence. “Tents are naturally not soundproofed, so any shenanigans going on inside will be heard in the wider vicinity,” he told Nation Cymru.
Planning documents showed that two shepherd huts are already located on the field under permitted development rules, which allow temporary use for camping for up to 28 days. The new proposal included adding facilities such as guest washing areas and an upgraded shelter for the alpacas.
A key feature of the application involved private hot tubs next to each shepherd hut, which raised further questions from councillors regarding water storage and environmental management during guest turnover.
Labour councillor Su McConnell of Croesonen expressed doubts about traffic management, stating:
“It is a very narrow lane, to have 12 vehicles coming and going on that lane is stretching my credulity to breaking point. I’ve got a real problem with the road access.”
Conservative councillor Rachel Buckler of Devauden added, “I have serious doubts about the set-up of this application and the impact on neighbouring properties.”
Mitchell Troy and Trellech councillor Jayne McKenna shared those concerns, particularly regarding how many people could be accommodated and the strain on shared facilities.
“The consensus seems to be a lot of members are not in favour of this application, and I happen to agree with them. I can’t help but feel this is an overdevelopment,” she said.
Planning officer Phil Thomas stated the site could host a maximum of 28 guests and that the nearest unit to Amberleigh House, a neighbouring property, would be 35 metres away, exceeding the standard 21-metre separation. He also confirmed that the highways department had not raised objections.
Despite this, the committee decided to defer the decision until its next meeting in August, where the application will be recommended for refusal. Reasons cited include overdevelopment, traffic concerns, noise impact, strain on local infrastructure, and loss of hedgerow to accommodate additional parking.
For outdoor hospitality business owners, the case underscores the increasing scrutiny rural glamping developments face in balancing tourism potential with environmental and community impact.
Operators should take note of planning committee concerns around infrastructure, sound, traffic, and neighbor proximity—key factors in site approval or rejection.