A proposed glamping development near Wilmer, British Columbia, has been revised following public opposition, with the number of planned sites reduced from 90 to 45.
The adjustment aims to address concerns raised by residents and the Regional District of East Kootenay (RDEK) regarding the project’s potential impact on the surrounding environment and rural character of the area.
The proposed nature resort would be located on a 42.5-acre property along Westside Road and would include a mix of stationary RVs, prospector tents, and small cottages.
The resort is designed to be terraced along the hillside, providing views of the Columbia Wetlands. Plans also include a trail network and viewing platforms, intended to offer guests nature-based experiences while keeping development above the wetland area and at least 20 metres from riparian zones.
Krista Gilbert, a planning technician with the RDEK, submitted a report stating that the revised density “is more appropriate for the character of the area and to reduce the impact to the surrounding ecosystem.”
While the board initially refused to proceed with the third reading of the bylaws associated with the application, directors indicated they might be open to supporting a reduced-density version.
As a result, the proponents, Widmer and Statham, offered to lower the number of sites, according to The Columbia Valley Pioneer.
“If not for the concerns about density (expressed at the public hearing), the board would have likely adopted the bylaws,” said planning consultant Richard Haworth, who represents the applicants.
He asked the board to reconsider the application with the reduced density in mind, noting that no additional notice or public hearing would be necessary if the board supports the changes.
The proposal has drawn mixed reactions from the community. A public hearing held earlier this year revealed that many residents opposed the project, citing increased traffic, wildfire risk, and potential threats to local wildlife.
Others expressed support, pointing to the possible economic benefits for the region, particularly through tourism-related job creation and increased spending at nearby businesses.
For business owners in the outdoor hospitality industry, this project highlights several strategic takeaways.
First, public and environmental concerns can significantly influence project approvals in rural or ecologically sensitive areas.
Second, scaling back development density may serve as a viable compromise to gain regulatory approval without abandoning a project entirely.
Lastly, aligning project design with environmental considerations—such as buffer zones and elevated positioning—can support both community acceptance and long-term sustainability goals.
Area F director Susan Clovechok was unavailable for comment at press time. No timeline has yet been confirmed for the board’s reconsideration of the application.